JetThoughts has been building software since 2008. Book a call, or write to sales@jetthoughts.com. You'll leave the call with a written one-page scope within 2 working days.
A 30-minute call; pick a time.
Your app shipped. It may already have customers. What you do not have is a way to tell whether it is safe: whether one customer can see another’s data, whether a real payment would reach your bank, whether a slow query is waiting for your busiest day, whether you could roll back a bad deploy.
You cannot audit it yourself, and you should not have to guess. A senior engineer reads your code and hands you a written report: what is wrong, how serious each finding is, and what each fix costs. If the app is in good shape, the report says so, and you stop there.
What the audit checks
The checklist comes from the ways AI-built apps actually fail:
- One customer seeing another’s data. Row-level security (RLS) on every Supabase table, policies that match your roles, and server-side checks behind every client-side rule. If RLS was never turned on for a table, the publishable key in your front end reads that whole table.
- Broken payments. Webhook signature verification, idempotent retries, and what happens when a charge fails halfway. “Looks wired up” and “actually enforces the rule” are different states, and they look identical in a demo.
- Slow queries. Missing indexes, a query re-run for every row on the page, whole-table reads behind innocent-looking screens.
- No way back. Whether you can roll back a bad deploy, restore from a backup that has been tested, and see what changed when something breaks.
- No tests. What is covered, what is not, and which untested path would hurt the most if it failed.
What the report gives you
Every finding comes with what it is in plain English, how serious it is, and the fixed price to fix it. You approve only the fixes you want, in the order you want.
The report is yours whether or not we do any work after it. Take it to your board, your investors, or another developer. If the app is in good shape, the report says so, and that is the end of it.
The audit is read-only. We do not copy secrets, customer data or credentials, and we do not touch production.
How fixes reach your repo
Fixes ship as pull requests in your own repository: small, reviewable, one finding at a time. You approve every merge, so the codebase never changes without you seeing the change.
Paul Keen, our founder, leads the audit and reviews every change himself. An engineer from our team writes the code. Our developers average 8+ years of experience each; they shipped production software before AI could write it, so they know where the AI tools cut corners.
When the audit says you need more
Sometimes the report comes back with a list too long for piecemeal fixes. Then we scope a rescue sprint from the report itself: hardening, tests, CI, and a handover your next hire can pick up. Same rules - fixed price agreed in writing before we start, work delivered as pull requests in your repo.
Why JetThoughts
We have been building software since 2008. About 95% of our clients stay with us, five years on average, and they rate us 4.8/5 on Clutch.
Paul has 22+ years in software. He is the top contributor to snap_diff-capybara - 306 commits, ahead of the next contributor’s 167 - a visual-regression testing gem that ships on RubyGems as capybara-screenshot-diff, downloaded 870K+ times as of 2026-10-04. Testing is exactly where AI-built apps are thinnest.
One client, Bruno Wozniak, Director of Engineering at PubNative, put it this way in a verified Clutch review: “Their team was also detailed and precise, helping us to find problems before they appear. We knew exactly what was happening and where we were going the whole time.”
What it costs
The audit is fixed-price. The number depends on the size of your codebase, and we agree it in writing before we start - it does not creep. If we find something that changes the scope, we stop, show you what we found, and you decide whether to adjust.
You never commit to fixes to get the diagnosis. The report prices each finding separately, so the diagnosis stays honest.
Questions founders ask first
What if the audit finds nothing serious? Then the report says so, and you stop there. A clean bill of health is a result you can show your board.
Do you need access to our customers’ data? No. The audit is read-only on the code. We do not copy secrets, customer data or credentials - ever.
Will you just tell us to rewrite it? The report answers salvage or rebuild per finding, with the price of each. Rewrite is the expensive answer, and we do not default to it.
Who does the work? Paul Keen leads the audit and reviews every change. An engineer from our team writes the code. You meet both on the call before anything starts.
Can we keep our current developers or agency? Yes. The report is yours, and fixes land as pull requests your team can review.
Read our write-ups first
- Migrate a Lovable or Replit App to Rails
- 9 Seconds: An AI Agent Wiped a Live SaaS
- The Quality Tax: AI MVPs Cost More to Fix
Book a call and bring the worry that made you read this far.
Tell us what you need built